A Class II Division I malocclusion can be differentiated from a Class II Division II malocclusion based upon the

Similar questions:

In determining the ideal proximal outline
form for a Class II amalgam cavity
preparation in a molar the
1. axial wall should be 1.5mm deep.
2. gingival cavosurface margin must
clear contact with the adjacent tooth.
3. proximal walls diverge occlusally.
4. facial and lingual proximal
cavosurface margins must just clear
contact with the adjacent tooth.

(2) and (4)
NDEB released questions set 1

During matrix placement for a Class II
cavity preparation, a wedge is placed to
1. separate the teeth.
2. adapt the matrix to the gingival
margin.
3. aid in the creation of a contact.
4. absorb moisture.

(1) (2) (3)
NDEB released questions set 1

During matrix placement for a Class II cavity preparation, a wedge is placed to
1. separate the teeth.
2. adapt the matrix to the gingival margin.
3. aid in the creation of a contact.
4. absorb moisture.

(1) (2) (3)
NDEB released questions set 1

Which of the following procedures will increase the retention of a Class III composite resin restoration in primary incisor and canine teeth?

Using labial or lingual dovetails.
NDEB released questions part 2 set 1

In determining the ideal proximal outline form for a Class II amalgam cavity perparation in a molar the
(1) axial wall should be 1.5mm deep
(2) gingival cavosurface margin must be clear contact with the adjacent tooth
(3) proximal walls diverage occlusally
(4) facial and lingual proximal cavosurface margins must just clear contact with the adjacent tooth

(2) (4)
NDEB released questions 2012 online set 1

In determining the ideal proximal outline form for a Class II amalgam cavity preparation in a molar the
1. axial wall should be 1.5mm deep.
2. gingival cavosurface margin must clear contact with the adjacent tooth.
3. proximal walls diverge occlusally.
4. facial and lingual proximal cavosurface margins must just clear contact with the adjacent tooth.

(2) and (4)
NDEB released questions 2012 online set 2

The most damaging characteristic of a Class II, Division 2 (Angle) malocclusion is the

deep overbite
NDEB released questions part 2 set 2

A Class II, Division 1 malocclusion is often associated with a thumbsucking habit. Based on the evidence available, thumbsucking should be

of concern beyond 5 years of age
NDEB released questions part 2 set 3

A Class III malocclusion is normally associated with

growth discrepancy
NDEB released questions part 2 set 3

In a Class II, division 1 occlusion, the most common finding is

mandibular retrognathism.
NDEB released questions part 2 set 3

The facial profile associated with a Class III malocclusion is

concave
NDEB released questions part 2 set 3

Isthmus fractures of a Class II amalgam restoration most frequently occur because of

inadequate width and bulk.
NDEB released questions part 2 set 4

Twenty-four hours after placement of a Class II amalgam restoration, a patient returns complaining of discomfort when "biting". There are no other symptoms. It is most likely that the

restoration is in supra-occlusion
NDEB released questions part 2 set 5

If the lining cement is left on the gingival cavosurface margin of a Class II amalgam restoration,

cement dissolution will lead to leakage
NDEB released questions part 2 set 6

The facial and lingual walls of the occlusal portion of a Class II cavity preparation for an amalgam in deciduous teeth should

converge toward the occlusal surface.
NDEB released questions part 2 set 7